![]() ![]() In Count II plaintiffs charge that defendants' actions constituted wrongful infliction of emotional distress under state law, and in Count III plaintiffs allege a loss of ability to enjoy life. ![]() Plaintiffs complain in Count I that defendant Goodall's evaluations contained false and defamatory matter, were prepared with malice and willful intent to injure, caused substantial injury to plaintiffs' social and professional reputations, and constituted defamation under state law. DeMeo was an incompetent nurse anesthetist and an unsupportive spouse. DeMeo's ability as an ophthalmologist and stated that Mrs. Goodall contained false and defamatory matter concerning Dr. Plaintiffs claim that the evaluation prepared and published by Dr. ยง 1332, the citizenship of the parties being diverse and the amount in controversy exceeding ten thousand dollars exclusive of interest and costs. ![]() Plaintiffs are residents of Staten Island, New York, defendant Goodall is a resident of Wolfeboro, New Hampshire, and defendant Huggins is a hospital operating under New Hampshire law and conducting business in Wolfeboro, New Hampshire. Plaintiffs seek monetary damages for the alleged defamatory statements of defendant Goodall contained in an evaluation prepared for defendant *1116 Huggins Hospital. Goodall, M.D., as a representative and agent of Huggins Hospital and against Huggins Hospital. DeMeo, M.D., have brought suit against defendants Edwin B. Lehman, Concord, N.H., for defendant Goodall. Theodore Wadleigh, Manchester, N.H., for defendant Huggins. GOODALL, M.D., personally Huggins Hospital. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |